Free Daily Podcast Summary
Bound By Oath by IJ: Daily Summaries Delivered
by Institute for Justice
Bound by Oath is a podcast series from the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice. It’s where the Constitution’s past catches up with the present. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution requires every judge to be “bound by Oath” to uphold “this Constitution.” But to understand if judges are following that oath, it’s important to ask, “What is in ‘this Constitution’?” Your host John Ross takes a deep dive into the Constitution’s text, history, and characters, and interviews historians, legal scholars, and the real people involved in historic and contemporary cases.
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- 1 weeks ago
Needless Friction. And Treason.
On this episode: the story of Pullman abstention, the first of several abstention doctrines the Supreme Court invented to let federal judges decline to decide cases that they have jurisdiction to decide. Click here for transcript. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Co.
- Apr 15, 20261h 20m
Rooker and Feldman and Treason | Season 4, Ep. 1
Next week, the Supreme Court is going to hear a huge civil rights case that no one is talking about—because the legal issue before the Court is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, an obscure and slightly treasonous doctrine that lets federal judges throw worthy cases out of court without reaching the merits. On this episode, we examine the doctrine's impact as well as its origins, including the life and times of the litigants for whom it is named, William Rooker and Marc Feldman. Rooker was a big shot Indiana lawyer who represented lynching victims and Klansmen. And Marc Feldman was a professor of law who fought for the little guy. Click here for transcript. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman
- Apr 15, 20261h 20m
Rooker and Feldman and Treason | Season 4, Ep. 1 Updated
Next week, the Supreme Court is going to hear a huge civil rights case that no one is talking about—because the legal issue before the Court is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, an obscure and slightly treasonous doctrine that lets federal judges throw worthy cases out of court without reaching the merits. On this episode, we examine the doctrine's impact as well as its origins, including the life and times of the litigants for whom it is named, William Rooker and Marc Feldman. Rooker was a big shot Indiana lawyer who represented lynching victims and Klansmen. And Marc Feldman was a professor of law who fought for the little guy. Click here for transcript. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman
- Oct 14, 20251h 11m
Indian Country | Season 3, Ep. 14
In our final episode of the season, we head to Indian Country and survey several strands of Supreme Court precedent that prevent Native Americans from putting their property to peaceful and productive use. Click here for transcript. United States v. Kagama Cobell v. Norton
- Jun 16, 20251h 12m
Neat Takings Tricks | Season 3, Ep. 13
The Fifth Amendment says that the government must pay just compensation when it takes private property for public use, a command that, regrettably, is often treated as a mere suggestion. On this episode, we take a look at a variety of gambits and flim-flammeries that let the government take property without paying for it. Click here for episode transcript. Agins v. Tiburon First English v. County of Los Angeles
- Apr 24, 202546 min
Trust But Verify | Season 3, Ep. 12
In 1973, federal narcotics agents raided a pair of homes in Collinsville, Illinois by mistake. They didn't find any drugs, but they did terrorize two innocent families. The incident sparked nationwide outrage, and in response Congress passed legislation crafting a legal remedy for victims of federal law enforcement abuses. Over the years, however, lower courts have chipped away at the law to the point where it has essentially been repealed: Last year, a federal appeals court rejected claims from an innocent family, the Martin family, who were held at gunpoint after the FBI mistakenly raided their home in Atlanta. Fortunately, next week, on April 29, 2025, the Supreme Court will hold oral argument in Martin v. United States, and IJ will urge the justices to reverse course. On this episode, we explore the Federal Tort Claims Act, which was originally enacted in 1946 and then amended in 1974, to create a remedy for wrongful acts by government officials. We feature guests who worked on getting the 1974 amendment, called the law-enforcement proviso, passed into law. Click here for episode transcript. Martin v. United States (Eleventh Circuit opinion)
- Jan 30, 2025
Everything You Eat, Drink, and Wear | Season 3, Ep. 11
Government officials must obtain a warrant before forcibly entering a home (absent consent or an emergency). That rule goes back to the Founding. But in a series of cases, culminating in Camara v. San Francisco in 1967, the Supreme Court announced an ahistorical exception, holding that the Fourth Amendment is less protective when it is a health inspector, rather than a police officer, knocking at the door. On this episode, we hear from Marshall Krause, who argued Camara on behalf of the ACLU of Northern California. And we head to Pottstown, Pennsylvania, where a challenge to the borough's rental inspection program lays bare the cost of ignoring traditional limits on government power. Click here for episode transcript. Frank v. Maryland Camara v. San Francisco
- Jan 1, 20251h 7m
Special Weapons and Tactics | Season 3, Ep. 10
In 2020, a police SWAT team blew up Vicki Baker's house after a fugitive barricaded himself inside. On this episode, we ask: who pays the tab when the government damages or destroys private property for the public good — the unlucky owner or the public as a whole? Click here for episode transcript. Pumpelly v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Company Armstrong v. United States
Get Bound By Oath by IJ summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
Cup Of Justice
Investigative journalists analyze high-profile trials and legal cases, breaking down court proceedings and public accountability.
Civics 101
Explains how U.S. government institutions and constitutional rights function in everyday life.
Our Constitution
Doing Justice
A former U.S. attorney examines high-stakes legal cases and the moral dilemmas behind prosecuting powerful figures.
Strict Scrutiny
Constitutional law professors analyze Supreme Court rulings, legal culture, and their impact on daily life.
Law and Chaos
Legal journalists analyze pivotal courtroom cases and their impact on American democracy.
Brief Recess: A Legal Podcast with Michael Foote & Mélissa Malebranche
Two lawyers dissect viral legal stories, answer listener questions, and explain how to use the law for social change.
More Perfect
Explores the human stories behind landmark Supreme Court decisions and their impact on American life.
History on Trial
Examines famous American trials to reveal how legal battles reflected and shaped cultural forces of their time.
Stanford Legal
Experts analyze pressing legal issues, landmark cases, and constitutional questions shaping American democracy and society.
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Three legal experts analyze everyday topics through a legal lens, exploring how law shapes common experiences and cultural phenomena.
What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law
A constitutional law professor and a podcaster explore how Trump’s presidency tested U.S. constitutional norms and principles.
About Bound By Oath by IJ
Bound by Oath is a podcast series from the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice. It’s where the Constitution’s past catches up with the present. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution requires every judge to be “bound by Oath” to uphold “this Constitution.” But to understand if judges are following that oath, it’s important to ask, “What is in ‘this Constitution’?” Your host John Ross takes a deep dive into the Constitution’s text, history, and characters, and interviews historians, legal scholars, and the real people involved in historic and contemporary cases.
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from Bound By Oath by IJ in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's Bound By Oath by IJ daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Bound By Oath by IJ as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the Bound By Oath by IJ podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official Bound By Oath by IJ product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Institute for Justice.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts. Upgrade to Pro for 15, or Premium for 50. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does Bound By Oath by IJ release new episodes?
Bound By Oath by IJ publishes monthly. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does Bound By Oath by IJ cover?
Bound By Oath by IJ covers topics including Government. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting Bound By Oath by IJ summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.