
In this episode, Scott Hanselman and Mark Russinovich dive into a growing issue in AI-driven research: hallucinated references in academic papers. After scanning thousands of conference submissions, Mark uncovers widespread citation inaccuracies, sparking a broader conversation about accountability, cognitive surrender, and the risks of over-relying on AI tools. They explore where AI adds value versus where it erodes critical thinking, from academic writing to everyday coding and content creation. The conversation shifts into the realities of vibe coding, the tradeoffs of speed versus quality, and what it means to maintain taste and expertise in an AI-accelerated world, ultimately asking: if AI lowers the barrier to create, does it also lower the standard? LLM Writing in Tech: Blogs and Articles Takeaways: AI hallucinations are already impacting academic research quality The future challenge isn’t using AI; it’s maintaining standards while using it There’s a growing tension between efficiency and craftsmanship Who are they? View Scott Hanselman on LinkedIn View Mark Russinovich on LinkedIn Watch Scott and Mark Learn on YouTube Listen to other episodes at scottandmarklearn.to Discover and follow other Microsoft podcasts at microsoft.com/podcasts Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Scott & Mark Learn To...Have Taste

Scott & Mark Learn To... ZoomIt, Evolved

Scott & Mark Learn To...Sculpt, not Spec

Scott & Mark Learn To... Beyond the Vibes: How Models Learn and Stitch Panoramas
Free AI-powered recaps of Scott & Mark Learn To... and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.