
First, the plaintiff rented from the defendant for five years. However, the defendant failed to return her security deposit, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff damaged a window and the walls and left trash in the place. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to do construction work in her office. However, she wasn't happy with the work, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims he is just an electrician, and the plaintiff needed a carpenter. Plus, the plaintiff bought a car from the defendant for her 16-year-old son. She soon found out it was a piece of junk and not safe to drive, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he was upfront about the vehicle's condition. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

'A Doggy Dilemma' & 'Job Not Done' & 'Boing, Boing, Boing Goes The Check'

'Fake'n The Bake'n' & 'Perturbing a Private Eye' & 'Maximum Unsatisfaction'

'Having a Sensitive Nose' & 'A Credit Card Fiasco' & 'Selling a Sour Car'

'Scam-A-Lam-A-Ding-Dong' & 'Not Finding It' & 'A Custom-Fit Lawsuit'
Free AI-powered recaps of The People’s Court Podcast and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.