
President Trump recently suggested that a proposed $1.8 billion compensation fund for alleged victims of government "weaponization" may not be dead after all. Listen here as Michael is joined by attorneys Michael Van Der Veen and William Brennan, who represented Donald Trump during his second impeachment trial and later defended numerous January 6 defendants. They argue that many January 6 participants were overcharged, politically targeted, and suffered devastating personal and financial consequences. Smerconish challenges their claims, presses them on comparisons to the George Floyd protests, and asks whether compensation for January 6 defendants is justified—or politically motivated itself. Original air date 4 June 2026. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Today's Poll Question: Should Tom Kean Jr.'s three-month unexplained absence disqualify him from re-election?

Today's Poll Question: Does limiting Trump's Iran war powers help America, or Tehran?

"This Is a Turning Point": Mark Halperin on Trump's Growing GOP Problem

Today's Poll Question: Is The GOP Revolt Against Trump's Slush Fund A One-Off or A Turning Point?
Free AI-powered recaps of The Smerconish Podcast and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.