Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-5.3 Codex: How I shipped 93,000 lines of code in 5 days
The speaker evaluates OpenAI's Codex (GPT-5.2/5.3 Codex) and Anthropic's Opus (4.6 and 4.6 fast) for software development tasks, concluding that Opus excels at generative, greenfield feature development and design, while Codex is superior for code review, architectural feedback, and ident
Sign up to read the full summary
Free AI-powered recaps of every episode, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Topics
Listen to This Episode
More from How I AI
Gemini 3 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-5.1 Codex: Which AI model is the best designer?
The power user’s guide to Codex: parallelizing workflows, planning techniques, advanced context engineering tips, automating code reviews, and more | Alexander Embiricos
Claude Opus 4.8 is here. Is it as good as they say?
GPT 5.5 just did what no other model could
Claude Opus 5 review: this model is brilliant (but annoying)
GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Claude Fable: Why OpenAI’s new model crushes my benchmark
Related episodes
From other shows on similar topics.
How to Use Opus 4.7 and the New Codex
The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis
Why humans are AI’s biggest bottleneck (and what’s coming in 2026) | Alexander Embiricos (OpenAI Codex Product Lead)
Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth
Inside Claude Code With Its Creator Boris Cherny
Y Combinator Startup Podcast
Why the Tech World Is Going Crazy for Claude Code
Odd Lots
Get summaries like this every morning.
Free AI-powered recaps of How I AI and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.