
Free Daily Podcast Summary
by Oyez
A case in which the游戏副本 held that the statutory bar in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) that prohibits certiorari review of court of appeals decisions on second or successive habeas applications does not apply to federal prisoners, and § 2244(b)(1)’s bar on claims previously presented does not apply to federal prisoners’ motions under § 2255(h).
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Trump administration lawfully ended the Temporary Protected Status program for Syrian nationals.
A case in which the Court will decide (1) when a generic drug manufacturer excludes a patented use from its label, whether it still be liable for inducing infringement if it calls its product a “generic version” of the brand-name drug and cites publicly available information about the brand-name drug's sales; and (2) whether a patent infringement complaint can survive dismissal if it does not allege that the defendant made any statement specifically instructing or encouraging the patented use.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Alien Tort Statute or the Torture Victim Protection Act allows a judicially-implied private right of action for aiding and abetting.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts a label-based failure-to-warn claim where EPA has not required the warning.
A case in which the Court will decide whether execution of a geofence warrant in this case violated the Fourth Amendment.
A case in which the Court will decide whether, to remove a lawful permanent resident who committed an offense listed in Section 1182(a)(2) and was subsequently paroled into the United States, the government must prove that it possessed clear and convincing evidence of the offense at the time of the lawful permanent resident’s last reentry into the United States.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Communications Act of 1934 provisions that govern the Federal Communications Commission’s assessment and enforcement of monetary forfeitures are consistent with the Seventh Amendment and Article III.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which prevents parties who lose in state courts from challenging injuries caused by state-court judgments, can be triggered by a state-court decision that remains subject to further review in state court.
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listeners also like.

Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Audio recordings of U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments, published immediately after each session.

Divided Argument
A podcast discussing the Supreme Court with analysis and commentary by hosts Will Baude and Dan Epps.
Bound By Oath by IJ
Explores the U.S. Constitution’s text and history through judicial oaths, legal scholarship, and landmark cases.

Law and Chaos
Legal journalists analyze pivotal courtroom cases and their impact on American democracy.

5-4
A progressive critique of the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions and the political forces shaping the law.

Bloomberg Law
Legal analysis from prominent attorneys and scholars on current cases and news-shaping issues, hosted by June Grasso.

Strict Scrutiny
Constitutional law professors analyze Supreme Court rulings, legal culture, and their impact on daily life.

Our Constitution

Civil Procedure
A podcast about Civil Procedure for law students and others interested in the subject.

Judge John Hodgman
A humor podcast where John Hodgman and Jesse Thorn rule on absurd real-life disputes with mock legal authority.

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
A weekly exploration of the U.S. Supreme Court, its justices, and the legal issues shaping American law and society.

Brief Recess: A Legal Podcast with Michael Foote & Mélissa Malebranche
Two lawyers dissect viral legal stories, answer listener questions, and explain how to use the law for social change.
A case in which the游戏副本 held that the statutory bar in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) that prohibits certiorari review of court of appeals decisions on second or successive habeas applications does not apply to federal prisoners, and § 2244(b)(1)’s bar on claims previously presented does not apply to federal prisoners’ motions under § 2255(h).
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Get key takeaways from U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments in a 5-minute read.
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Oyez.
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts. Upgrade to Pro for 15, or Premium for 50. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments publishes daily. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments covers topics including Government. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.